|
Page 1 - Page 2
A. Case study A 45-year-old woman was referred to a hospital’s allergy clinic after a 7-year history of unresolved perennial rhinitis. She experienced watery rhinorrhoea, itching of the nasal mucosa, and frequent uncontrollable sneezing fits. She said there were periods of slight improvement, but she could not associate these with anything in particular. Previous treatment had included antihistamines as well as local corticosteroids, both of which had had little or no effect. QUESTIONS AT THIS
POINT: DISCUSSION: WHAT CAN BE DONE
AT THIS POINT? The following tests
can be carried out to assist in reaching a conclusion: DISCUSSION: On the fifth day, nasal symptoms totally disappeared. Although the improvement was dramatic, it may have been coincidental. As diet had not been assessed previously, the absence of any additive or almost any food could have been responsible for the improvement. The actual amounts of various additives in her diet was unknown making it difficult to identify higher than expected intakes of a particular additive. Environmental changes at the time of implementation or even psychological factors could have played a role. It was decided to continue an additive-free diet for a month and then to challenge the patient with various common additives. During the next 3 weeks, she remained symptom-free, but before returning to the clinic she decided to experiment at home and went back to her previous unrestricted diet. After 3 days, nasal symptoms recurred and worsened progressively until she returned to the clinic. The relapse during her unplanned open challenge at home warranted returning her to an additive-free diet and implementing a double-blind placebo-controlled additive challenge under controlled hospital conditions once her symptoms had disappeared. The additive-free diet was resumed, and after 4-5 days symptoms gradually disappeared. After 3 weeks without symptoms, the patient underwent double-blind, placebo-controlled oral challenges with various common food additives. The additives and placebos were given in identical opaque capsules. Each additive was increased in incremental doses until acceptable daily intake (ADI) levels were reached or she developed clinical manifestations. The additives tested included sodium metabisulphite, sodium benzoate, sodium glutamate, sodium nitrite, sulphur dioxide, tartrazine and sorbic acid. The patient continued the additive-free diet throughout the study period. She was randomly challenged with single additives and multiple placebos at intervals of a week. Both the active substances and the placebos were masked in orange juice, which was free of additives. Oranges also do not contain natural benzoates. The patient was monitored at the allergy clinic for at least 2 hours after each challenge. About an hour after the administration of 50 mg sodium benzoate, the patient reported itching of the nasal mucosa that worsened during the next hour, and sneezing and rhinorrhoea manifested. The rhinitis lasted for about 36 hrs. No other substance induced nasal symptoms. To confirm this finding, she was re-challenged 2 weeks later with sodium benzoate and 3 placebos in a double-blind and randomised fashion. Again, she responded to the active substance only; the rhinitis lasted about 36 hours. CONCLUSION: The challenge with sodium benzoate exactly reproduced the clinical symptoms that had been present over the past 7 years. As in most cases of food additive intolerance, the pathogenic mechanisms remained elusive. The observation that perennial rhinitis may be caused by the frequent (probably daily) ingestion of small doses of a non-tolerated substance suggests that some patients with chronic rhinitis might actually be intolerant of a particular food additive.
Food additives, from a chemical and functional perspective, are a heterogeneous group of substances including preservatives, antioxidants, dyes, emulsifiers, stabilisers and sweeteners. Their consumption has led to much public concern and debate, particularly as possible causes of a number of illnesses. There is a great discrepancy, however, between the subjective perception of hypersensitivity to food additives and the results of objective diagnostic tests and research.1,2,3,4,5 Hypersensitivity to preservatives, including benzoates, is usually due to a non-immune-mediated response (intolerance). A. WHAT
ARE BENZOATES AND WHERE ARE THEY FOUND? Benzoates are among the world’s most commonly used additives in food manufacturing. For the purpose of this review, “benzoates” will refer to the 2 most common forms, namely benzoic acid and sodium benzoate, which will be discussed in detail. Benzoic acid and sodium benzoate are widely used as antimycotic agents and antibacterial preservatives in various foods and beverages, as well as in some pharmaceuticals (such as antihistamine medication).6 Benzoic acid is a white crystalline solid with an acidic pH. It is an organic compound with a carboxyl group bound directly to a benzene ring. It demonstrates limited solubility in water and is moderately soluble in oils, stable and odourless. It can be synthesised from a variety of organic compounds, including benzyl alcohol, benzaldehyde, toluene and phthalic acid. Commercially manufactured/synthetic benzoic acid is obtained mainly by the oxidation of toluene.6,7 The salts of benzoic acid are produced by the reaction between the acid and an appropriate hydroxide. Commercially, sodium benzoate is the most commonly used of the three benzoic acid salts. Occasionally, potassium benzoate is used where lower sodium content is required. In contrast to its acidic precursor, sodium benzoate is a white crystalline powder with an alkaline pH and is water-soluble as well as soluble in alcohol, ether, chloroform and fixed oils, making it the preferred form for use in food products.6 Benzoate Metabolism For a dermally applied benzoic acid dose, excretion varies depending on the amount applied and the site of application, due to differing scales of penetration. The forehead demonstrates the greatest facility for penetration, followed by the abdomen, then the thigh, chest, arm, and the back, which allows the least penetration.6,8
a.
Benzoates in manufactured products They are often synergistically used in combination with other preservatives, such as sorbates, and are also used in conjunction with sulphur dioxide for the purpose of inhibiting enzymatic action and browning. Their use in yeast-raised flour products is not allowed, as they inactivate the yeast. Benzoates, specifically benzoic acid, can be used for flavouring, but since they provide a distinctive flavour to foodstuffs, the concentration at which they can be used is limited. Sodium benzoate may be used as a preservative in margarine, codfish, bottled soft drinks, maraschino cherries, mincemeat, fruit juices, pickles, fruit jelly preserves and jams. In addition, it may be added to the ice used for cooling fish, and may be an ingredient in eye creams, vanishing creams, and toothpastes.6,9 Benzoic acid may be used in carbonated and non-carbonated beverages, ice-cream, ices, candies, baked goods, pie and pastry fillings, icings, chewing gum and tobacco. It may also be used in pickles and margarine. In such processed foods, benzoic acid is used up to a level of 0.1%.6,9 b.
Benzoates in natural sources Benzoates are also substances that are natural to the body’s metabolism, and para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) is produced by the intestinal flora. PABA plays a role in the breakdown and use of proteins and in the formation of red blood cells. It stimulates folic acid production and helps maintain healthy skin and hair.7 Single foods which
are considered to contain high levels of benzoic acid include6,7,8: Combinations of
natural benzoate-containing foods may also contribute to a higher than
expected level of natural benzoates, e.g., in raspberry yoghurt. Levels of natural benzoic acid in foods:
*Vaccinium species
= cranberry, blueberry, lingonberry, loganberry, bilberry c.
Benzoates in cosmetic and pharmaceutical products Intravenous sodium benzoate therapy (with sodium phenyl acetate) has been shown to be beneficial for patients with an inborn error of the urea cycle and acute hyperammonaemia. The drugs provide alternative pathways to ureagenesis for waste nitrogen disposal and help maintain nitrogen homeostasis.11,12
Page 1 - Page 2
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||